Review



62-ch synamps 2  (Compumedics)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Compumedics 62-ch synamps 2
    <t>EEG</t> relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.
    62 Ch Synamps 2, supplied by Compumedics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/62-ch synamps 2/product/Compumedics
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    62-ch synamps 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The impact of comorbid anxiety on quantitative EEG heterogeneity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder"

    Article Title: The impact of comorbid anxiety on quantitative EEG heterogeneity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychiatry

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190713

    EEG relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.
    Figure Legend Snippet: EEG relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.

    Techniques Used: Control

    Theta to beta ratio of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA; † , significant group difference in post hoc analyses. By hierarchical clustering analysis based on Q-EEG relative power values, participants of the ADHD-Only group and the ADHD-ANX group were divided into four clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 44 children (26.5% of children with ADHD), including 40 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and four from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 2 consisted of 72 children (43.4% of children with ADHD), including 60 from the ADHD-Only group (42.6% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 12 from the ADHD-ANX group (48.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 3 consisted of 39 children (23.5% of children with ADHD), including 35 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and 4 from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 4 consisted of 11 children (6.6% of children with ADHD), including 6 from the ADHD-Only group (4.3% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 5 from the ADHD-ANX group (20.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). The ratios of psychiatric comorbidities showed statistically significant differences between clusters ( χ 2 = 8.43, p = 0.04). Furthermore, there were statistically significant difference in the ratios of children with comorbid anxiety disorder across each cluster. ( χ 2 = 10.02, p = 0.02) .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Theta to beta ratio of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA; † , significant group difference in post hoc analyses. By hierarchical clustering analysis based on Q-EEG relative power values, participants of the ADHD-Only group and the ADHD-ANX group were divided into four clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 44 children (26.5% of children with ADHD), including 40 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and four from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 2 consisted of 72 children (43.4% of children with ADHD), including 60 from the ADHD-Only group (42.6% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 12 from the ADHD-ANX group (48.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 3 consisted of 39 children (23.5% of children with ADHD), including 35 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and 4 from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 4 consisted of 11 children (6.6% of children with ADHD), including 6 from the ADHD-Only group (4.3% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 5 from the ADHD-ANX group (20.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). The ratios of psychiatric comorbidities showed statistically significant differences between clusters ( χ 2 = 8.43, p = 0.04). Furthermore, there were statistically significant difference in the ratios of children with comorbid anxiety disorder across each cluster. ( χ 2 = 10.02, p = 0.02) .

    Techniques Used: Control



    Similar Products

    62-ch synamps 2  (Compumedics)
    90
    Compumedics 62-ch synamps 2
    <t>EEG</t> relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.
    62 Ch Synamps 2, supplied by Compumedics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/62-ch synamps 2/product/Compumedics
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    62-ch synamps 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    62-ch synamps 2 neuroscan system  (Compumedics Neuroscan)
    90
    Compumedics Neuroscan 62-ch synamps 2 neuroscan system
    <t>EEG</t> relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.
    62 Ch Synamps 2 Neuroscan System, supplied by Compumedics Neuroscan, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/62-ch synamps 2 neuroscan system/product/Compumedics Neuroscan
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    62-ch synamps 2 neuroscan system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    EEG relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychiatry

    Article Title: The impact of comorbid anxiety on quantitative EEG heterogeneity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EEG relative power of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (A) shows relative power of delta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (B) shows relative power of theta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (C) shows relative power of alpha frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. Panel (D) shows relative power of beta frequency band in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA, † significant group difference in post hoc analyses.

    Article Snippet: Electroencephalography recording was conducted using a 62-channel digital electroencephalography device (62-ch SynAmps 2 Neuroscan system, Compumedics, Charlotte, NC, USA).

    Techniques: Control

    Theta to beta ratio of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA; † , significant group difference in post hoc analyses. By hierarchical clustering analysis based on Q-EEG relative power values, participants of the ADHD-Only group and the ADHD-ANX group were divided into four clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 44 children (26.5% of children with ADHD), including 40 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and four from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 2 consisted of 72 children (43.4% of children with ADHD), including 60 from the ADHD-Only group (42.6% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 12 from the ADHD-ANX group (48.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 3 consisted of 39 children (23.5% of children with ADHD), including 35 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and 4 from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 4 consisted of 11 children (6.6% of children with ADHD), including 6 from the ADHD-Only group (4.3% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 5 from the ADHD-ANX group (20.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). The ratios of psychiatric comorbidities showed statistically significant differences between clusters ( χ 2 = 8.43, p = 0.04). Furthermore, there were statistically significant difference in the ratios of children with comorbid anxiety disorder across each cluster. ( χ 2 = 10.02, p = 0.02) .

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychiatry

    Article Title: The impact of comorbid anxiety on quantitative EEG heterogeneity in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190713

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Theta to beta ratio of ADHD-only, ADHD-ANX, and healthy control groups in frontal, central, and posterior regions. *, significant ( p < 0.05) group difference in ANCOVA; † , significant group difference in post hoc analyses. By hierarchical clustering analysis based on Q-EEG relative power values, participants of the ADHD-Only group and the ADHD-ANX group were divided into four clusters. Cluster 1 consisted of 44 children (26.5% of children with ADHD), including 40 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and four from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 2 consisted of 72 children (43.4% of children with ADHD), including 60 from the ADHD-Only group (42.6% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 12 from the ADHD-ANX group (48.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 3 consisted of 39 children (23.5% of children with ADHD), including 35 from the ADHD-Only group (28.4% of children in the ADHD-only group) and 4 from the ADHD-ANX group (16.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). Cluster 4 consisted of 11 children (6.6% of children with ADHD), including 6 from the ADHD-Only group (4.3% of children in the ADHD-only group), and 5 from the ADHD-ANX group (20.0% of children in the ADHD-ANX group). The ratios of psychiatric comorbidities showed statistically significant differences between clusters ( χ 2 = 8.43, p = 0.04). Furthermore, there were statistically significant difference in the ratios of children with comorbid anxiety disorder across each cluster. ( χ 2 = 10.02, p = 0.02) .

    Article Snippet: Electroencephalography recording was conducted using a 62-channel digital electroencephalography device (62-ch SynAmps 2 Neuroscan system, Compumedics, Charlotte, NC, USA).

    Techniques: Control